Tilbudskonkurranse is the Part II procedure, as a rule from NOK 1.3 million up to the EEA thresholds. Negotiating after the tender deadline is allowed.
In Norwegian: Tilbudskonkurranse
Definition
A national tender competition (tilbudskonkurranse) is the procedure the contracting authority uses when a procurement follows Part II of the Public Procurement Regulations (anskaffelsesforskriften); all § references on this page are to the Regulations. Part II, which applies from NOK 1.3 million up to the EEA thresholds (except health and social services), and to special services (særlige tjenester) from NOK 1.3 million with no upper limit (§ 5-1), covers supply, service and works contracts and special services. It offers two forms, the open and the restricted national tender competition (§ 8-3), and the competition is advertised in Doffin, Norway's national database for public procurement notices (§ 8-17). For special services above the EEA threshold of NOK 8.7 million, some rules from Part III also apply, among them advertising in TED (Tenders Electronic Daily, the EU's database of contract notices) and a standstill period of at least 10 days.
In an open national tender competition, any interested supplier may submit a tender, and the competition has one stage. In a restricted national tender competition, anyone may request to participate, but only those the contracting authority invites may submit a tender (§ 9-2). The contracting authority may set a minimum and, if it wishes, a maximum number of suppliers to invite, and must then state the limits and the criteria for limiting the number of candidates in the procurement documents. It must then select enough to ensure genuine competition, and no fewer than three, but fewer if there are not enough suppliers (§ 8-9).
Unlike the open or restricted procedure (anbudskonkurranse) under Part III, where negotiation is not allowed (§ 23-6 (3)), the contracting authority may negotiate with the suppliers in a national tender competition. After the tender deadline, the contracting authority decides whether to hold a dialogue with the suppliers. The dialogue may cover all aspects of the tenders and include, among other things, clarifications and negotiations, and it may be held with one or more suppliers, provided they are chosen in line with the principle of equal treatment (§ 9-3). In the procurement documents, the contracting authority must state whether it plans a dialogue and, if so, what the dialogue will cover and, as far as possible, how it will be conducted. If the contracting authority departs from the plan, the reasons must be entered in the procurement record (§ 10-5).
Part II has no fixed minimum time limits for requests to participate or tenders. The contracting authority must set the time limits taking account of the complexity of the contract and the time the suppliers need to prepare requests and tenders (§ 8-14), and the time limit must be stated in the contract notice. When the supplier has been chosen, the contracting authority sends a notification with reasons to those concerned and, as a rule, may sign the contract at the earliest after a reasonable standstill period (karensperiode) that it sets itself (§ 10-1 and § 10-2); see the page on the standstill period.
Why it matters for suppliers
Advice: read what the tender documents say about dialogue before you set your price. If they say that the contracting authority plans negotiations, you may get a round to improve your tender, but as a rule the plan is not binding, and the contracting authority may award the contract on the basis of the tenders as submitted. Advice: submit a tender you can live with as final, both on price and on solution.
If the contracting authority chooses to negotiate with only some of the suppliers, the selection must, according to DFØ (the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management), follow a ranking against the award criteria of the tenders as they stood at the tender deadline. A weak first tender can therefore keep you out of the negotiations. According to DFØ, the contracting authority may still choose to clarify ambiguities and deviations first, and rank the tenders afterwards. DFØ also writes that you have no right to change parts of your tender other than those the contracting authority raises, and that the contracting authority has no general duty to guide you in the negotiations.
Deviations and qualification are treated differently. The contracting authority may wait until after the dialogue to decide whether a tender must be rejected, but has no duty to do so (§ 9-7). In Part II, the Regulations do not tie this option to particular grounds for rejection (§ 9-7 (2)); for Part III, see the page on the competitive procedure with negotiation. DFØ writes that even a material deviation can then be corrected, and that only tenders where this does not succeed must be rejected. According to DFØ, in case 2020/528 KOFA (the Complaints Board for Public Procurement) found that the contracting authority has no duty to continue the dialogue until all deviations are corrected. According to DFØ, practice on the other hand suggests that a qualification requirement must be met at the tender deadline: in case 2020/515 KOFA, and in LE-2022-19926 the Court of Appeal (lagmannsretten), found that the requirement cannot be met later through dialogue. According to DFØ, the wording of § 9-3 nevertheless allows dialogue about the documentation showing that the requirement was met at the deadline.
In a restricted national tender competition, the request to participate is the first thing you submit, and a request that arrives too late may be rejected (§ 9-4). If the contracting authority has set a time limit for applying for interim measures (midlertidig forføyning) against the rejection of your request or against you not being selected, the time limit must be stated in the procurement documents and in the notification to you, and it is at least 15 days from the day after the notification (§ 8-16). Since 1 July 2026, only undertakings established in Norway or another EEA state, or in a state that is party to the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) or another agreement binding Norway, have rights under the Act and the Regulations, and the latter only to the extent that agreement gives them rights (Public Procurement Act § 3). Other undertakings may take part in competitions but cannot rely on those rights. In the dialogue, the contracting authority must treat the suppliers equally and may not give the others access to your solutions or other confidential information without your consent to that specific information (§ 9-3).
Legal basis
Public Procurement Regulations (anskaffelsesforskriften) § 5-1, § 5-3, § 8-3, § 8-9, § 8-10, § 8-14, § 8-15, § 8-16, § 8-17, § 9-1 to § 9-4, § 9-6, § 9-7, § 10-1, § 10-2, § 10-5, § 16-12, § 17-1, § 20-2, § 20-3, § 21-1, § 23-6 and § 25-2
Example
A municipality advertises in Doffin an open national tender competition for cleaning four schools, estimated at NOK 2.1 million for the whole contract period. That is below the EEA threshold of NOK 2.5 million for municipalities, so Part II applies. The tender documents say that the municipality plans negotiations with the three best according to the award criteria, and the tender deadline is set at 24 days. Six tenders come in. You are ranked second and are invited to negotiate, while the tender in fifth place is not. In the meeting, you learn that your staffing plan pulls your score down, and you submit a revised tender within the deadline the municipality sets. The municipality also asks for the certificate of registration (firmaattest) you forgot to attach. It shows that you were registered before the tender deadline, so according to DFØ it can be submitted afterwards.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between an open and a restricted national tender competition?
In an open national tender competition, anyone who wishes may submit a tender. In a restricted one, you first request to participate, the contracting authority assesses whether you meet the qualification requirements, and only those invited submit tenders. If the contracting authority selects among the qualified suppliers, at least three must be invited, if there are that many. DFØ writes that a restricted national tender competition can suit cases where preparing and evaluating the tenders takes a lot of resources. Both forms can include a dialogue with the suppliers after the tender deadline.
What is the difference between a tilbudskonkurranse and an anbudskonkurranse?
Tilbudskonkurranse (national tender competition) is the procedure in Part II of the Regulations, anbudskonkurranse (open or restricted procedure) the one in Part III. The main differences for you as a supplier: in a national tender competition, the contracting authority may hold a dialogue and negotiate after the tender deadline, while negotiation is not allowed in an open or restricted procedure. Part II has no fixed minimum time limits for requests to participate and tenders; Part III has. When the contracting authority selects participants, the minimum is three in a restricted national tender competition and five in a restricted procedure. And in Part II the contracting authority may require a self-declaration, while the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) is mandatory in competitions under Part III. The Part III rules are on the page on the open and restricted procedure.
Can the contracting authority negotiate with only some of the suppliers?
Yes. The contracting authority may hold a dialogue with one or more, but the selection must be in line with the principle of equal treatment (§ 9-3 (2)). According to DFØ, this means that a contracting authority that wants to negotiate with only some must rank the tenders against the award criteria as they stood at the tender deadline, and choose the best. If it wants to negotiate with three, they must be the three ranked highest. A dialogue only to clarify ambiguities or correct deviations may be held with those whose tenders have ambiguities or deviations. If the dialogue turns into negotiations, the contracting authority can, according to DFØ, no longer limit it to them.
Can the contracting authority change its mind about dialogue?
Yes, as a rule. The Regulations require the contracting authority to state what it plans, and the decision on dialogue is taken after the tender deadline (§ 9-2 and § 9-3). According to DFØ, in case 2019/670 KOFA found that a contracting authority is as a rule not bound by what it plans. The contracting authority may therefore negotiate even if it wrote that it did not plan to, and refrain even if it planned to. DFØ writes that only a clear statement that the contracting authority waives dialogue, or negotiations only, binds it.
How long a tender deadline do I get in a national tender competition?
There is no fixed minimum time limit for tenders in Part II. The contracting authority must take account of the complexity of the contract and the time it takes to prepare the tender (§ 8-14). DFØ mentions, among other things, the nature and size of the procurement, how extensive the tender has to be, and public holidays in the period. According to DFØ, in case 2017/157 KOFA found that a time limit of less than three hours for submitting revised tenders in an open national tender competition was clearly too short. If the contracting authority has not set a tender validity period (vedståelsesfrist), you are bound by your tender for 30 days after the tender deadline (§ 8-15).
In Tendline
Tendline writes the tender and fills in the price form, and you approve before it is submitted →Sources
- Lovdata: Public Procurement Regulations (anskaffelsesforskriften), § 5-1, § 5-3, § 8-3, § 8-9, § 8-10, § 8-14 to § 8-17, § 9-1 to § 9-4, § 9-6, § 9-7, § 10-1, § 10-2, § 10-5, § 16-12, § 17-1, § 20-2, § 20-3, § 21-1, § 23-6 and § 25-2 (Norwegian)
- DFØ: National tender competition, open and restricted (Norwegian)
- DFØ: Guide to the Public Procurement Regulations, chapter 12 Conducting the competition (Part II) (Norwegian)
- DFØ: Guide to the Public Procurement Regulations, chapter 11 Planning and advertising (Part II) (Norwegian)
- EUR-Lex: Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement, Articles 18 and 59 (English terminology)
- EUR-Lex: Directive 2007/66/EC on review procedures (Remedies Directive), Article 2 (English terminology)
Last checked against the sources: 14 October 2026